Cement Energy and Environment

1.08 Table 1: Comparative proximate analysis of fuel quid fuel (ALF) . Pet-coke Coal I TDF, Volatile Matter % Ash% Carbon % Hydrogen % Sulfur % Nitrogen% Calorific Value 95.68 1.43 l l3.94 7.31 <0.1 !i.59 5850 Table 2: Chemical analysis of sampiE~s without ALF '1.' -'.' · Parameters Kll "iii> ~":\~ Loss on Ignition (%) K20 (%) 0.30 Na20 (%) 0.06 S03 (%) 0.04 Cl- (%) 0.00 Si02 12.60 Al203 2.79 Fe203 2.75 Mn203 0.08 Lime Saturation Factor 10!~.79 Table 3: Chemical analysis of samples with ALF Loss on Ignition (%) 35.81 1<20 (%) 0.:31 N<120 (%) 0.05 S03 (%) 0.04 Cl- (%) 0.00 SiOz 12.66 AI20 3 2.94 Fe20 3 2./'4 Mn20 3 0.09 Lime Saturation Factor 107.74 1.09 Acceptance criteria CPCB & APPCB: CPCB and APPCB have given the guidelines and directives regarding safety & environment aspects for handling and firing liquid hazardous waste (organic waste residues I spent organic solvent) in to kiln 13.0 36.8 72 7.1 14 7 82.6 80.6 84 3.4 4.6 5 4.9 0.7 2 1.75 0.3 1.75 6800 5800 0.51 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.40 0.01 0.00 9.55 21.68 4.61 5.20 2.57 4.03 0.08 0.10 138.91 94.81 38.26 0.28 0.41 0.51 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.31 0.00 0.00 9.87 21 .34 4.24 5.29 2.32 3.99 0.08 0.13 137.17 96.08 main burner, all aspects were taken care and the system was commissioned. The commissioning was successful with the study of emissions and minor constituents in product as per guideli nes of CPCB in add ition to operational stabilization. 22 •